Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01802
Original file (BC 2014 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01802
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His diagnosis of symptomatic pes planus (flat feet) be 
removed from his records so that he may reenlist in the 
military.

2.  His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4C (Separated for 
concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet 
physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 
9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading 
Abilities Test, or void enlistments) be changed to allow reentry 
in the military.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has never been diagnosed with Pes Planus and never had an 
issue with his feet.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release 
or Discharge from Active Duty, on 16 Jul 13, the applicant 
enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 

According to a Notification Memorandum, dated 9 Sep 13, the 
applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his 
discharge for erroneous enlistment.  The reason for the action 
was that a medical narrative summary, dated 30 Aug 13 found he 
did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist.  He should not 
have been allowed to join the Air Force because he has 
symptomatic pes planus.

On 9 Sep 13, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action, 
waived his right to counsel and elected not to submit statements 
on his behalf.

On 11 Sep 13, the discharge authority directed the applicant be 
furnished an entry level separation for erroneous enlistment. 

On 12 Sep 13, the applicant was discharged and credited with 
1 month and 27 days of total active service.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AETC/SGPS recommends denial recommends denial of the applicant’s 
request to remove the diagnosis of symptomatic pes planus from 
his records, indicating that no error or injustice occurred 
during the separation process.  With a history of his diagnosis, 
the applicant will not be considered for a future waiver to re-
enter military service.

A review of the applicant’s records and medical notes revealed 
the applicant’s foot pain during the second week of training 
became so severe that he could not participate in training.  On 
30 Aug 13, he was diagnosed with symptomatic pes planus.  
Although the applicant denied foot problems prior to entering 
the military, his provider felt the condition did exist prior to 
service and was aggravated by the strenuous physical activity of 
training.  This condition does not resolve and becomes 
asymptomatic with continued activity.  The applicant declined a 
review waiver to remain in the Air Force and made a statement 
that the military was not for him.  He indicated that he 
understood the diagnoses and treatment plan and was subsequently 
processed for entry level separation.

The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change his RE code to one that will allow him reentry in the 
military.  However, the 4C RE code is erroneous and should be 2C 
(Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry 
level separation without characterization of service) as 
required by Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2606, Reenlistments 
in the USAF, based on his entry level separation with 
uncharacterized character of service.  The RE code 2C has 
priority over RE code series 1, 3, and 4.  Therefore, AFPC/DPSOY 
will administratively correct the applicant’s military personnel 
records and provide him a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with 
an RE code of 2C.

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 11 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit E).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01802 in Executive Session on 11 Feb 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                        , Panel Chair
	                    , Member
	                        , Member




The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01802 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 27 May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 Jun 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Aug 14.




                                   

                                  


4

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02810

    Original file (BC 2013 02810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 19 May 2008. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, unless otherwise directed by the board. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01503

    Original file (BC 2014 01503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reason for this action was a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Nov 13, that found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist; specifically, that the applicant had anemia. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial as it pertains to the applicant’s medical diagnosis,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02616

    Original file (BC 2014 02616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02616 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4C (Failed medical procurement standards) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to reenlist. On 26 Aug 10, the discharge authority directed the applicant receive an ELS under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01015

    Original file (BC 2014 01015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The medical authorities concluded that the applicant had a pre-existing condition that would have precluded him from joining the Air Force had this condition been made known at the time of his enlistment. We note that AFPC/DPSOA has determined the applicant’s reentry (RE) code of 4C was issued erroneously and has corrected his records administratively to reflect that he was issued an RE code of 2C; however, in view of the fact that it appears as though the applicant’s disqualifying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00785

    Original file (BC 2014 00785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial indicating that based on the documentation on file and subsequent civilian examination the recommendation for separation was done in accordance with established policy and procedures. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196

    Original file (BC-2011-00196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496

    Original file (BC-2011-03496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975

    Original file (BC-2012-02975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...